**Motivations:**
- Enforce a neutral technical writing style for contributions
- Remove self-evaluative editorial phrasing that distracts from definitions and results
**Root causes:**
- The text contained meta-judgments about importance/rigor ("main contribution", "conceptually decisive", "voluntarily...", etc.) that do not state mathematical facts
- Redaction guidelines did not explicitly prohibit this style, so it reappeared across chapters
**Correctifs:**
- Update ` IA_agents/redaction.md` with explicit prohibitions, allowed phrasing, and a self-check checklist
- Trim those evaluative methodological one-liners across `v0/livre.md` to keep statements factual
**Evolutions:**
- Make the writing rules explicit and keep the manuscript more readable and neutral
**Pages affectées:**
- IA_agents/redaction.md
- v0/livre.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Nicolas Cantu
f46b4eaa2d