**Motivations:** - Traçabilité et cohérence du livre v0 (phrasé méta, lexique, citations) **Correctifs:** - Phrasé méta neutre (ch10-14), crossref (ch11), lexique (ch15-16) - Admissibilité des citations (ch1) - Tableaux Markdown pipe final (ch8) - Artifacts filecite, sync introduction/fermeture - Corruption LaTeX indices - Lexique futur accessible globalement **Pages affectées:** - v0/chapitre3-8.md, v0/livre.md - fixKnowledge/ : 2026-02-17-v0-chapter1-admissibility-citations, v0-livre-ch8-markdown-table-trailing-pipe, v0-livre-ch10-16-neutral-*, v0-livre-filecite-artifacts, v0-livre-introduction-fermeture-sync, v0-livre-latex-subscript-corruption, v0-livre-lexicon-futur-accessible-global, v0-livre-neutral-meta-phrasing-global Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
| author | date | scope | type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4NK Team | 2026-02-17 | v0/livre.md (global) | fix |
Fix: Neutralize meta-phrasing and emphasis qualifiers across v0/livre.md
Problem
Several sections in v0/livre.md used meta/editorial framing and emphasis qualifiers (e.g. “important”, “crucial”, “volontairement”, “majeur”, “socle”) in places where the text can be stated as direct descriptive content.
Impacts
- Adds meta framing instead of direct statements.
- Introduces emphasis qualifiers that do not contribute to definitions, hypotheses, or deductions.
Cause
Neutral-style rewrites were applied chapter-by-chapter, but some occurrences remained outside the previously edited slices.
Root cause
No global audit pass was applied to remove meta/emphasis qualifiers across the full v0/livre.md.
Fix applied
Applied the correction only in v0/livre.md:
- Rewrote meta lead-ins into direct statements (e.g. “Il est important de noter…” → “On note…”).
- Replaced emphasis qualifiers with descriptive phrasing (e.g. “crucial”, “majeur”, “socle consensuel”, “volontairement…”, “parcimonieux”).
- Kept technical meaning unchanged (definitions, conditions, and references).
Affected pages
v0/livre.md
Deployment / regeneration considerations
- If
v0/livre.mdis regenerated fromv0/chapitre*.md, this fix can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if these phrasings reappear.
Analysis / verification steps
- Search in
v0/livre.mdfor:important,crucial,volontairement,majeur,socle,parcimonand verify that remaining occurrences are either absent or used only in a strictly technical sense.