Nicolas Cantu
8726355f84
**Motivations:** - Traçabilité et cohérence du livre v0 (phrasé méta, lexique, citations) **Correctifs:** - Phrasé méta neutre (ch10-14), crossref (ch11), lexique (ch15-16) - Admissibilité des citations (ch1) - Tableaux Markdown pipe final (ch8) - Artifacts filecite, sync introduction/fermeture - Corruption LaTeX indices - Lexique futur accessible globalement **Pages affectées:** - v0/chapitre3-8.md, v0/livre.md - fixKnowledge/ : 2026-02-17-v0-chapter1-admissibility-citations, v0-livre-ch8-markdown-table-trailing-pipe, v0-livre-ch10-16-neutral-*, v0-livre-filecite-artifacts, v0-livre-introduction-fermeture-sync, v0-livre-latex-subscript-corruption, v0-livre-lexicon-futur-accessible-global, v0-livre-neutral-meta-phrasing-global Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
| author | date | scope | type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4NK Team | 2026-02-17 | v0/livre.md (Chapter 16) | fix |
Fix: Neutralize meta-phrasing and align lexicon in Chapter 16 (v0/livre.md)
Problem
Chapter 16 in v0/livre.md contained:
- meta/editorial lead-ins for result announcements (e.g. “résultat attendu… strictement technique”),
- terminology not aligned with the canonical lexicon requested by corrective chapters 30/32 (use of “cône(s) de futur” instead of “futur accessible”),
- emphasis phrasing in explanatory passages (e.g. “La distinction est cruciale…”, “Le point essentiel…”).
Impacts
- Adds meta framing instead of direct descriptive statements.
- Breaks terminological consistency with the “one concept, one term” policy for the core text.
Cause
Drafting-layer phrasing and pre-lexicon terminology remained in the Chapter 16 slice of v0/livre.md.
Root cause
Neutral-style rewrites and the canonical lexicon audit were not applied consistently to Chapter 16 during manual consolidation.
Fix applied
Applied the correction only in v0/livre.md (Chapter 16):
- Replaced result-announcement meta phrasing with a direct lead-in (
On obtient :). - Replaced “cône(s) de futur” with the canonical “futur accessible” in the Chapter 16 section title and definition lead-in.
- Replaced “La distinction est cruciale …” with a descriptive statement (no task/utility required; statistical coupling only).
- Replaced “Le point essentiel …” with a direct statement (“Il s’agit …”).
Affected pages
v0/livre.md
Deployment / regeneration considerations
- If
v0/livre.mdis regenerated fromv0/chapitre*.md, this fix can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if these phrasings or terms reappear.
Analysis / verification steps
- In the Chapter 16 slice, search for result-announcement meta markers and emphasis qualifiers, and rewrite into descriptive statements.
- In the Chapter 16 slice, enforce the canonical term
futur accessibleand avoid rejected synonyms.