Nicolas Cantu
8726355f84
**Motivations:** - Traçabilité et cohérence du livre v0 (phrasé méta, lexique, citations) **Correctifs:** - Phrasé méta neutre (ch10-14), crossref (ch11), lexique (ch15-16) - Admissibilité des citations (ch1) - Tableaux Markdown pipe final (ch8) - Artifacts filecite, sync introduction/fermeture - Corruption LaTeX indices - Lexique futur accessible globalement **Pages affectées:** - v0/chapitre3-8.md, v0/livre.md - fixKnowledge/ : 2026-02-17-v0-chapter1-admissibility-citations, v0-livre-ch8-markdown-table-trailing-pipe, v0-livre-ch10-16-neutral-*, v0-livre-filecite-artifacts, v0-livre-introduction-fermeture-sync, v0-livre-latex-subscript-corruption, v0-livre-lexicon-futur-accessible-global, v0-livre-neutral-meta-phrasing-global Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
52 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
author: 4NK Team
|
||
date: 2026-02-17
|
||
scope: v0/livre.md (Chapter 16)
|
||
type: fix
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Fix: Neutralize meta-phrasing and align lexicon in Chapter 16 (`v0/livre.md`)
|
||
|
||
## Problem
|
||
|
||
Chapter 16 in `v0/livre.md` contained:
|
||
|
||
- meta/editorial lead-ins for result announcements (e.g. “résultat attendu… strictement technique”),
|
||
- terminology not aligned with the canonical lexicon requested by corrective chapters 30/32 (use of “cône(s) de futur” instead of “futur accessible”),
|
||
- emphasis phrasing in explanatory passages (e.g. “La distinction est cruciale…”, “Le point essentiel…”).
|
||
|
||
## Impacts
|
||
|
||
- Adds meta framing instead of direct descriptive statements.
|
||
- Breaks terminological consistency with the “one concept, one term” policy for the core text.
|
||
|
||
## Cause
|
||
|
||
Drafting-layer phrasing and pre-lexicon terminology remained in the Chapter 16 slice of `v0/livre.md`.
|
||
|
||
## Root cause
|
||
|
||
Neutral-style rewrites and the canonical lexicon audit were not applied consistently to Chapter 16 during manual consolidation.
|
||
|
||
## Fix applied
|
||
|
||
Applied the correction **only** in `v0/livre.md` (Chapter 16):
|
||
|
||
- Replaced result-announcement meta phrasing with a direct lead-in (`On obtient :`).
|
||
- Replaced “cône(s) de futur” with the canonical “futur accessible” in the Chapter 16 section title and definition lead-in.
|
||
- Replaced “La distinction est cruciale …” with a descriptive statement (no task/utility required; statistical coupling only).
|
||
- Replaced “Le point essentiel …” with a direct statement (“Il s’agit …”).
|
||
|
||
## Affected pages
|
||
|
||
- `v0/livre.md`
|
||
|
||
## Deployment / regeneration considerations
|
||
|
||
- If `v0/livre.md` is regenerated from `v0/chapitre*.md`, this fix can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if these phrasings or terms reappear.
|
||
|
||
## Analysis / verification steps
|
||
|
||
- In the Chapter 16 slice, search for result-announcement meta markers and emphasis qualifiers, and rewrite into descriptive statements.
|
||
- In the Chapter 16 slice, enforce the canonical term `futur accessible` and avoid rejected synonyms.
|