algo/fixKnowledge/2026-02-17-v0-livre-ch15-neutral-and-lexicon.md
Nicolas Cantu 8726355f84 Correctifs v0 livre : phrasé neutre, lexique, citations, tables, LaTeX, filecite
**Motivations:**
- Traçabilité et cohérence du livre v0 (phrasé méta, lexique, citations)

**Correctifs:**
- Phrasé méta neutre (ch10-14), crossref (ch11), lexique (ch15-16)
- Admissibilité des citations (ch1)
- Tableaux Markdown pipe final (ch8)
- Artifacts filecite, sync introduction/fermeture
- Corruption LaTeX indices
- Lexique futur accessible globalement

**Pages affectées:**
- v0/chapitre3-8.md, v0/livre.md
- fixKnowledge/ : 2026-02-17-v0-chapter1-admissibility-citations, v0-livre-ch8-markdown-table-trailing-pipe, v0-livre-ch10-16-neutral-*, v0-livre-filecite-artifacts, v0-livre-introduction-fermeture-sync, v0-livre-latex-subscript-corruption, v0-livre-lexicon-futur-accessible-global, v0-livre-neutral-meta-phrasing-global

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-02-18 00:08:32 +01:00

2.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

author date scope type
4NK Team 2026-02-17 v0/livre.md (Chapter 15) fix

Fix: Neutralize meta-phrasing and align lexicon in Chapter 15 (v0/livre.md)

Problem

Chapter 15 in v0/livre.md contained:

  • editorial/meta qualifiers around definitions and result announcements (e.g. “rigoureusement”, “rigueur”, “attendu”, “sous une forme rigoureuse”),
  • a terminology mismatch with the canonical lexicon requested in corrective chapters 30/32 (use of “cône(s) de futur” instead of the canonical “futur accessible”).

Impacts

  • Introduces meta/editorial framing in the main text instead of direct descriptive statements.
  • Breaks terminological consistency with the lexicon policy (“one concept, one term”) requested by the corrective chapters.

Cause

Drafting-layer phrasing and pre-lexicon terminology remained in the Chapter 15 slice of v0/livre.md.

Root cause

Neutral-style rewrites and the canonical lexicon audit were not applied consistently to Chapter 15 during manual consolidation.

Fix applied

Applied the correction only in v0/livre.md (Chapter 15):

  • Lobjectif est de définir rigoureusement :On définit :
  • le cône de futur (atteignabilité)le futur accessible (atteignabilité)
  • Pour éviter toute auto-justification, ...Lactualisation des contraintes ...
  • Remarques de rigueur.Remarques.
  • des cônes de futurdes futurs accessibles
  • des devenirs accessiblesdes futurs accessibles
  • Le résultat logique attendu est atteint sous une forme rigoureuse :Il sensuit :

Affected pages

  • v0/livre.md

Deployment / regeneration considerations

  • If v0/livre.md is regenerated from v0/chapitre*.md, this fix can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if these phrasings or terms reappear.

Analysis / verification steps

  • In the Chapter 15 slice, search for meta-qualifiers around definitions/results (e.g. rigueur*, attendu) and rewrite into direct descriptive statements.
  • In the Chapter 15 slice, enforce the canonical term futur accessible and avoid rejected synonyms (e.g. cône de futur).