**Motivations:** - Traçabilité et cohérence du livre v0 (phrasé méta, lexique, citations) **Correctifs:** - Phrasé méta neutre (ch10-14), crossref (ch11), lexique (ch15-16) - Admissibilité des citations (ch1) - Tableaux Markdown pipe final (ch8) - Artifacts filecite, sync introduction/fermeture - Corruption LaTeX indices - Lexique futur accessible globalement **Pages affectées:** - v0/chapitre3-8.md, v0/livre.md - fixKnowledge/ : 2026-02-17-v0-chapter1-admissibility-citations, v0-livre-ch8-markdown-table-trailing-pipe, v0-livre-ch10-16-neutral-*, v0-livre-filecite-artifacts, v0-livre-introduction-fermeture-sync, v0-livre-latex-subscript-corruption, v0-livre-lexicon-futur-accessible-global, v0-livre-neutral-meta-phrasing-global Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
| author | date | scope | type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4NK Team | 2026-02-17 | v0/livre.md (Chapter 11) | fix |
Fix: Neutral phrasing + chapter cross-reference in Chapter 11 (v0/livre.md)
Problem
Chapter 11 in v0/livre.md contained:
- evaluative meta-phrasing (“majeure”, “décisive”) in result announcements,
- an inconsistent internal cross-reference: “attracteur de second ordre (chapitre 8)” while the formal definition is located in Chapter 5 of
v0/livre.md.
Impacts
- Stylistic drift: meta-qualifiers introduce editorial judgement rather than descriptive statements.
- Navigation drift: the cross-reference can mislead readers searching for the definition.
Cause
The Chapter 11 slice in v0/livre.md kept drafting-layer phrasing and a stale chapter number for the referenced definition.
Root cause
Unidentified manual edit or transformation step introduced/kept:
- meta-qualifiers in result announcements,
- a chapter-number mismatch after reordering/renaming the compiled
v0/livre.mdstructure.
Fix applied
Applied the correction only in v0/livre.md (Chapter 11):
### Conséquence structurale majeure→### Conséquence structuraleLa conséquence logique est décisive :→Il s’ensuit :attracteur de second ordre (chapitre 8)→attracteur de second ordre (chapitre 5)
Affected pages
v0/livre.md
Deployment / regeneration considerations
- If
v0/livre.mdis regenerated fromv0/chapitre*.md, these changes can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if the same phrasings or the stale reference reappear.
Analysis / verification steps
- Search Chapter 11 for result-announcement qualifiers (e.g.
majeure,décisive) and rewrite into descriptive statements. - Check internal references of the form
(... chapitre N ...)against actual headings inv0/livre.mdto ensure consistency after compilation/reordering.