Nicolas Cantu
8726355f84
**Motivations:** - Traçabilité et cohérence du livre v0 (phrasé méta, lexique, citations) **Correctifs:** - Phrasé méta neutre (ch10-14), crossref (ch11), lexique (ch15-16) - Admissibilité des citations (ch1) - Tableaux Markdown pipe final (ch8) - Artifacts filecite, sync introduction/fermeture - Corruption LaTeX indices - Lexique futur accessible globalement **Pages affectées:** - v0/chapitre3-8.md, v0/livre.md - fixKnowledge/ : 2026-02-17-v0-chapter1-admissibility-citations, v0-livre-ch8-markdown-table-trailing-pipe, v0-livre-ch10-16-neutral-*, v0-livre-filecite-artifacts, v0-livre-introduction-fermeture-sync, v0-livre-latex-subscript-corruption, v0-livre-lexicon-futur-accessible-global, v0-livre-neutral-meta-phrasing-global Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
| author | date | scope | type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4NK Team | 2026-02-17 | v0/livre.md (Chapter 13) | fix |
Fix: Neutralize editorial/meta phrasing in Chapter 13 (v0/livre.md)
Problem
Chapter 13 in v0/livre.md contained a few editorial/meta formulations (e.g. “l’intérêt scientifique…”, “Pour éviter…”) that comment on what should matter or justify a writing device, instead of stating definitions or classification criteria directly.
Impacts
- Introduces non-technical judgement / editorial framing in the main text.
- Creates inconsistency with the neutral technical phrasing used elsewhere.
Cause
Drafting-layer phrasing persisted in the Chapter 13 slice of v0/livre.md.
Root cause
Neutral-style rewrites were not applied consistently for Chapter 13 during manual consolidation.
Fix applied
Applied the correction only in v0/livre.md (Chapter 13):
- Replaced “l’intérêt scientifique du verrouillage…” with a descriptive phrasing (“on caractérise…”).
- Removed “Pour éviter ce glissement…” in the “Hypothèses et ruptures” section and stated directly that results are accompanied by a structured note.
- Replaced “Pour éviter un retour de plasticité…, l’ouvrage adopte…” with a neutral convention statement (“On fixe la convention suivante.”).
Affected pages
v0/livre.md
Deployment / regeneration considerations
- If
v0/livre.mdis regenerated fromv0/chapitre*.md, this fix can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if these phrasings reappear.
Analysis / verification steps
- Search Chapter 13 for editorial/meta markers (e.g.
intérêt scientifique,Pour éviter,l’ouvrage adopte) and rewrite into descriptive statements.