**Motivations:** - Make the hybrid path (C1→C2→C3) operational with explicit targets - Define R_m exactly as used by the pipeline for citable artefacts - Keep execution transcripts out of proof documents via stable run reports **Root causes:** - Hybrid continuation lacked a concrete invariant/lemma agenda and a precise R_m definition - No standardized run report format in docs/ **Correctifs:** - Document the pipeline-level definition of R_m (D/F update rules and artefact schema) - Add explicit prioritization and lemma targets for the hybrid trajectory **Evolutions:** - Add a standard run report template and a filled example with sha256 fingerprints **Pages affectées:** - applications/collatz/collatz_k_scripts/plan_lemmes_manquants_et_programme_de_preuve.md - docs/fixKnowledge/collatz_docs_status_and_transcript_cleanup.md - docs/collatz_run_report_format.md - docs/collatz_run_report_2026-03-04_extend_D18_D21_resume_from_D20.md
3.1 KiB
3.1 KiB
Auteur : Équipe 4NK
Collatz docs: proof status and transcript cleanup
Problem
Two Collatz documents mixed a mathematical narrative with an execution transcript (shell prompt + run logs + conversational text) and contained a logical mismatch:
- The text asserted a complete proof / total coverage / global threshold conclusion.
- The cited run excerpt reported a non-empty residual core at the audited final palier (e.g.
out/noyaux/noyau_post_D21.jsonwith a large number of residues).
This combination makes the documents non-citable as a proof document: conclusions are stated as established facts while the referenced artefacts do not discharge the required closure hypothesis.
Root cause
- A run transcript and subsequent discussion were pasted directly into
applications/collatz/conjoncture_collatz.md, after the conclusion section, without being moved to a dedicated log/report file. - The wording in the conclusions did not keep the closure hypothesis explicit (extinction of the residual core
R_M), and conflated partial extinction (e.g. “both” core) with global closure.
Corrective actions
- Remove the pasted transcript from
applications/collatz/conjoncture_collatz.mdso the file remains a mathematical document. - Requalify the end of
applications/collatz/conjoncture_collatz.md:- keep “both” extinction as its own statement,
- state global closure as conditional on an explicit hypothesis
H_{\mathrm{ext}}(M): R_M=\varnothing, - and document the selected continuation path (“hybrid”).
- Update
applications/collatz/démonstration collatz.mdto include the hybrid continuation option (certificate reduction + structural characterization + specific lemma) and keep the document conditionally correct.
Impact
- The documents no longer contain a terminal transcript in the body of the proof text.
- Statements about global closure are now conditional on an explicit hypothesis, consistent with the run artefacts reported in the repository.
Analysis modalities
- When a run transcript is needed, store it in a dedicated file (or in
out/artefacts) and reference it from the proof document via a stable path and reproducible script invocation. - Use the standard run report template in
docs/collatz_run_report_format.md, and keep at least one concrete filled report indocs/for citation. - For status checks, prefer referencing:
applications/collatz/collatz_k_scripts/diagnostic_run_D18_D21_et_statut_preuve.mdapplications/collatz/collatz_k_scripts/errata_demonstration_collatz.mdapplications/collatz/collatz_k_scripts/plan_lemmes_manquants_et_programme_de_preuve.md
Deployment
No deployment. This change is documentation-only.
Pages affected
applications/collatz/conjoncture_collatz.mdapplications/collatz/démonstration collatz.mdapplications/collatz/collatz_k_scripts/plan_lemmes_manquants_et_programme_de_preuve.mddocs/fixKnowledge/collatz_docs_status_and_transcript_cleanup.mddocs/collatz_run_report_format.mddocs/collatz_run_report_2026-03-04_extend_D18_D21_resume_from_D20.md