---
author: 4NK Team
date: 2026-02-17
scope: v0/livre.md (global)
type: fix
related_corrective_chapters:
  - v0/chapitre24.md
  - v0/chapitre30.md
---

# Fix: Add normative glossary, hypothesis library, and historical NCI correspondence in `v0/livre.md`

## Problem

Corrective chapters require the manuscript to be **auditable**:

- a **stable canonical lexicon** (one term per concept),
- explicit **layer markers** (E/M/P/D) at the level of definitions/results,
- a **library of hypothesis identifiers** to avoid implicit “status” drift in interpretative sections,
- and a way to keep **NCI vocabulary** out of the core while still providing a historical reading aid.

## Impacts

- Without a normative glossary + hypothesis IDs, audits (interdits/synonyms/layer drift) are hard to perform mechanically.
- Without an explicit historical correspondence table, readers may re-import NCI meanings by inference, or “forbidden terms” may reappear without a controlled location and label.

## Cause

The book content accumulated chapter-by-chapter, but the editorial/audit artifacts were not centralized as normative tables.

## Root cause

No single, book-level “contract” existed to:

- define canonical terms + rejected synonyms,
- define hypothesis IDs for conditional statements,
- isolate NCI terms into an explicitly labeled historical appendix/table.

## Fix applied

Applied the correction **only** in `v0/livre.md`:

- Added a **normative glossary** structure and a minimal table (canonical term, definition, layer, dependencies, internal references, rejected synonyms).
- Added a **hypothesis table** (atomic hypotheses and reusable packages), enabling consistent references in conditional/interpretative passages.
- Added an explicitly labeled **historical correspondence table** “NCI → canonical lexicon”, placed outside the core narrative and introduced as a reading aid (not a justification).

## Affected pages

- `v0/livre.md`

## Deployment / regeneration considerations

- If `v0/livre.md` is regenerated from `v0/chapitre*.md`, these artifacts can be overwritten. The generating pipeline (or the source chapters) should carry the same glossary/hypothesis/correspondence blocks to keep audits stable across regenerations.

## Analysis / verification steps

- Search `v0/livre.md` for NCI terms (e.g. `NCI`, `Néon`, `vortex`, `bit utile`) and verify they appear only in the explicitly labeled historical correspondence table (and not in the core).
- Search for rejected synonyms (e.g. `cône de futur`, `espace des futurs`, `futur possible`) and verify they appear only in “rejected synonyms” lists / historical tables.
- Verify that conditional “implication” passages reference hypothesis identifiers (H‑F, H‑Det, H‑Cpt, …) rather than implicit status claims.