---
author: 4NK Team
date: 2026-02-17
scope: v0/livre.md (Chapter 13)
type: fix
---

# Fix: Neutralize editorial/meta phrasing in Chapter 13 (`v0/livre.md`)

## Problem

Chapter 13 in `v0/livre.md` contained a few editorial/meta formulations (e.g. “l’intérêt scientifique…”, “Pour éviter…”) that comment on what should matter or justify a writing device, instead of stating definitions or classification criteria directly.

## Impacts

- Introduces non-technical judgement / editorial framing in the main text.
- Creates inconsistency with the neutral technical phrasing used elsewhere.

## Cause

Drafting-layer phrasing persisted in the Chapter 13 slice of `v0/livre.md`.

## Root cause

Neutral-style rewrites were not applied consistently for Chapter 13 during manual consolidation.

## Fix applied

Applied the correction **only** in `v0/livre.md` (Chapter 13):

- Replaced “l’intérêt scientifique du verrouillage…” with a descriptive phrasing (“on caractérise…”).
- Removed “Pour éviter ce glissement…” in the “Hypothèses et ruptures” section and stated directly that results are accompanied by a structured note.
- Replaced “Pour éviter un retour de plasticité…, l’ouvrage adopte…” with a neutral convention statement (“On fixe la convention suivante.”).

## Affected pages

- `v0/livre.md`

## Deployment / regeneration considerations

- If `v0/livre.md` is regenerated from `v0/chapitre*.md`, this fix can be overwritten. The generating pipeline should be checked if these phrasings reappear.

## Analysis / verification steps

- Search Chapter 13 for editorial/meta markers (e.g. `intérêt scientifique`, `Pour éviter`, `l’ouvrage adopte`) and rewrite into descriptive statements.